Talk:You Should be So Lucky!
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Count me in as a second user of the adjective "dread"; the Dread Pirate Roberts will keel-haul me if I remain silent on this issue. ''(Delete ad lib.)'' [[User:Cdickson|Cdickson]] 22:14, 12 January 2007 (GMT) | Count me in as a second user of the adjective "dread"; the Dread Pirate Roberts will keel-haul me if I remain silent on this issue. ''(Delete ad lib.)'' [[User:Cdickson|Cdickson]] 22:14, 12 January 2007 (GMT) | ||
:Yeah, but 1,030,000 Googles for "the dread" is trounced by 2,170,000 "the dreaded"s. God, everyone has to be so original these days. DJB (actually quite impressed that Google indexes 'the's) [[User:Davidbod|Davidbod]] 02:52, 13 January 2007 (GMT) | :Yeah, but 1,030,000 Googles for "the dread" is trounced by 2,170,000 "the dreaded"s. God, everyone has to be so original these days. DJB (actually quite impressed that Google indexes 'the's) [[User:Davidbod|Davidbod]] 02:52, 13 January 2007 (GMT) | ||
| + | I think 'be So Lucky' should be 'Be So Lucky'. Yes? --[[User:Thalbert|Thalbert]] 23:26, 14 January 2007 (GMT)TH | ||
Revision as of 23:26, 14 January 2007
Count me in as a second user of the adjective "dread"; the Dread Pirate Roberts will keel-haul me if I remain silent on this issue. (Delete ad lib.) Cdickson 22:14, 12 January 2007 (GMT)
- Yeah, but 1,030,000 Googles for "the dread" is trounced by 2,170,000 "the dreaded"s. God, everyone has to be so original these days. DJB (actually quite impressed that Google indexes 'the's) Davidbod 02:52, 13 January 2007 (GMT)
I think 'be So Lucky' should be 'Be So Lucky'. Yes? --Thalbert 23:26, 14 January 2007 (GMT)TH
