Talk:You Should be So Lucky!
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*I think 'be So Lucky' should be 'Be So Lucky'. Yes? --[[User:Thalbert|Thalbert]] 23:26, 14 January 2007 (GMT)TH | *I think 'be So Lucky' should be 'Be So Lucky'. Yes? --[[User:Thalbert|Thalbert]] 23:26, 14 January 2007 (GMT)TH | ||
**No - see "Title case" section of [[UKGameshows:Help#Indexing_policy]]. - DJB | **No - see "Title case" section of [[UKGameshows:Help#Indexing_policy]]. - DJB | ||
| + | ***I heartily agree with that rule set (I live by it most of the time) and it works for all other entries, but this one just looks a tad odd to me. Just a tad.--[[User:Thalbert|Thalbert]] 15:48, 15 January 2007 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 15 January 2007
- Count me in as a second user of the adjective "dread"; the Dread Pirate Roberts will keel-haul me if I remain silent on this issue. (Delete ad lib.) Cdickson 22:14, 12 January 2007 (GMT)
- Yeah, but 1,030,000 Googles for "the dread" is trounced by 2,170,000 "the dreaded"s. God, everyone has to be so original these days. DJB (actually quite impressed that Google indexes 'the's) Davidbod 02:52, 13 January 2007 (GMT)
- I think 'be So Lucky' should be 'Be So Lucky'. Yes? --Thalbert 23:26, 14 January 2007 (GMT)TH
- No - see "Title case" section of UKGameshows:Help#Indexing_policy. - DJB
- I heartily agree with that rule set (I live by it most of the time) and it works for all other entries, but this one just looks a tad odd to me. Just a tad.--Thalbert 15:48, 15 January 2007 (GMT)
- No - see "Title case" section of UKGameshows:Help#Indexing_policy. - DJB
