Talk:Everybody's Equal
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It would seem unduly rude and not in the UKGS spirit to edit over a difference of opinion ("dread" aside) but I will '''fight''' for the right to change "terrible, terrible opening sequence" to "excellent opening sequence". (Could we poll the audience on this one?) [[User:Cdickson|Cdickson]] 09:22, 2 March 2007 (GMT) | It would seem unduly rude and not in the UKGS spirit to edit over a difference of opinion ("dread" aside) but I will '''fight''' for the right to change "terrible, terrible opening sequence" to "excellent opening sequence". (Could we poll the audience on this one?) [[User:Cdickson|Cdickson]] 09:22, 2 March 2007 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Terrible opening sequence, but quite good theme. NIG | ||
Current revision as of 13:46, 2 March 2007
It would seem unduly rude and not in the UKGS spirit to edit over a difference of opinion ("dread" aside) but I will fight for the right to change "terrible, terrible opening sequence" to "excellent opening sequence". (Could we poll the audience on this one?) Cdickson 09:22, 2 March 2007 (GMT)
Terrible opening sequence, but quite good theme. NIG
