Pointless

Synopsis

Cross the surveys of Family Fortunes with the inverse scoring of Beat the Nation and you get... well, you get Topranko!, more or less. Or, if you're the BBC and pitching for the daytime audience, you get this. If it was us, we probably wouldn't tempt fate (and TV critics) by calling it Pointless, though.

So anyway, Endemol — or rather their appointed agents, specifically market research company Redshift Research (replaced by Morar Consulting in 2016, and from 2018 credited to its specialist polling division Viga, which is now Savanta... hope you're keeping up with this) — has given 100 people, 100 seconds to name as many things as they can in a given category. These categories are fairly varied, although categories relating to countries and their languages, locations, affiliations etc, do seem to appear far more often than any other category. In the studio, the contestants only have to come up with one answer at a time, and (provided it's a valid answer) they will score points, from zero to 100, depending on how many people gave that answer in the survey. The aim is to give the most obscure answers, and thereby receive the lowest score. Ideally, one would give an answer that nobody gave in the survey - a "pointless" answer - thus scoring nothing at all, and incidentally adding £250 to the jackpot (which starts at £1000 and goes up by £1000 each day it remains unwon). The show's round structure changed considerably from series 1 to series 2, although the basic set-up of asking contestants to guess obscure answers from those provided by 100 surveyed people remained the same.

Series 1

Five pairs start. Each of the first three rounds has the same gameplay: a general category (say, "film" or "politics") is given, to allow each pair to decide which of them will go first in that round. Once the order has been decided, the actual question is given, e.g. "Films directed by Steven Spielberg" or "British Prime Ministers Since 1900" and Richard Osman duly puts the categories in context by confirming exactly what's required and the main source from which the answers are drawn. Alexander Armstrong asks the first player in each pair in turn to give an answer fitting that category; a valid answer scores as outlined above, while an invalid answer scores a penalty of 100 points. After the first player from each pair has given an answer, the second player steps forward to give their answer. The player from the pair who gave their answer last in the first section gives their answer first, the player from the pair who gave their answer fourth in the first section answers second and so on, thereby limiting any unfairness resulting from being the last to answer. Once both players in each pair have answered, the pair with the highest score is eliminated, however each pair is allowed to return for a second and final chance on the next day's show. In the event of a tie-break, each pair must provide another answer, over which they can confer. Each round is treated as a separate contest, with the scores starting afresh from zero each time.

After three rounds, the two surviving pairs play the "head to head" round; the scoring is as before, but now conferring is allowed and encouraged. Also the pair who scored lower over the previous three rounds gets to choose one of two categories. (They also get to choose whether to go first or second, though it seems unlikely that a few seconds' extra thinking time would make up for the disadvantage of always having second "pick", so anyone with their wits about them will choose to go first.) The pairs get an equal number of turns, and the round ends when one or both pairs go over 100 points. The higher-scoring team is eliminated and the other wins the "coveted" Pointless trophy.

The winning team also gets to go for the cash jackpot, which entails picking one of three categories and then giving a Pointless answer to whatever the question is. They are given up to one minute to come up with three answers, however they only need one of them to be Pointless to win the jackpot, but even so it's a very difficult endgame and is rarely won. Oddly, whereas the pairs eliminated earlier in the game can return for second try the next day, the pair who reach the final are not allowed to return the next day, regardless of whether they win or not, and immaterial of whether it is their first time on the show. A problem (which is fixed in series 2) with this section arises from contestants tending to give what they consider their best answer first, which can lead to a bit of an anticlimax if this doesn't win, and their remaining two answers are obviously duds.

Series 2

The first major change is a reduction from 5 pairs of contestants to 4, allowing more time for Alexander and Richard to, basically, be funny. Apparently, when Alexander Armstrong saw the first series, he was so shocked that all the off-script banter had been edited out, he begged the producers to keep it in. Other than this, round one is identical to the first three rounds of the previous series; everyone gets to give one answer each and the highest-scoring pair are knocked out.

Onto round 2, and they start to shake things up a bit. Sort of. The format is identical, but the contestants are presented with a list of seven options to choose from. Each list, we are told, contains at least one pointless answer (oooooh), but at least one incorrect answer as well (booooo). A new list of 7 is presented after the first three contestants have given their answer. Whilst this change is presumably supposed to trick the viewer into thinking there is more variety going on than there really is, it does give them the opportunity to ask slightly harder questions (or questions for which there is no definitive list of all possible correct answers, e.g. "stringed instruments"), as well as to give contestants who have absolutely no idea a chance. (A not too uncommon scenario in the first series would be for a contestant, needing a good answer to stay in, having no idea and either playing it safe or coming up with something ridiculous, neither of which made for particularly exciting telly.) Another result of the change (and you can decide for yourself whether this is a good or bad thing) is that it may be possible to work out which is the pointless answer simply by a process of elimination. As fully-paid-up members of the shout-the-answer-at-the-telly club, we also have to report that picking out a pointless answer from a selection provided, is nowhere near as satisfying a playalong experience as coming up with pointless answers yourself.

After the second set of answers the highest scoring pair are, as usual, shown the door, and we move onto round three, which for those of you who have been paying attention, is the Head to Head.

Here they have made arguably the most improvement. Rather than the single question, to-and-fro, first-to-100-except-not-if-the-other-team-go-over-by-more format of series 1, we have a best-of-5, where each pair gives one answer and the one that scores lower earns a point. This is quite a clever move on several counts. Firstly, we get more questions, which is always a good thing, especially when in the previous series we might have to watch for five or more minutes as contestants gave answers to just one question. It also makes the round much more dramatic. Once both pairs have given their answer, we have a split-screen Pointless-o-meter.

One pair's answer is checked, and one half of the Pointless-o-meter goes down (or turns into an X, as for any other wrong answer). We then swap to the other team and do the same thing. This makes every question at least a little bit exciting; unlike series 1 where either the first few were pretty uninteresting (because no-one was going to get close to 100 for a while), or the game was (pretty much) over immediately when it became apparent that one pair didn't know anything at all about 'pre-1980 BBC Oxford weathermen'. One benefit that must surely have been felt by the researchers, if not by the viewers (and certainly not by the contestants), is that with only two answers being given to any question, there is much more scope for lists with very few members, some examples of which will show up once the series has aired (though one example to get you started is "members of The Famous Five", of which there are, well, five). Although one downside to this is that occasionally they choose a list where many people will know all the answers (such as "words that GNVQ stands for"), in which case the pair that went first will (usually) have a huge advantage.

The team that gets to three points first wins, and goes on to the Pointless final, which remains unchanged, except that contestants are asked to rank their three answers in order of confidence. This cleverly solves the problem of contestants giving their 'best' answer first, which led to some anticlimax in the first series.

Series 3

More changes were afoot in the third series. The second round was changed again, so that instead of a straight list of things in a category, players are now presented with what is essentially a list of trivia questions on a theme - for example, they may be given a list of movie taglines and asked to name the movie, or a list of characters from children's literature and asked to name the book. A wrong answer results in a 100 point penalty, a right answer scores in the usual fashion.

The first round sometimes follows the standard first-round format, and sometimes the old second-round format. The head-to-head round has been reduced to best-of-three, but the jackpot round is unchanged.

Halfway through the third series, in time for a move to BBC One, a week of celebrity specials went out; these were usually 50 minutes rather than 45, and celebrities started at £2,500 rather than £1,000, presumably because pairs didn't roll over from show to show and that's roughly how much the average civilian pair wins. Celebrity editions gained a new name, Pointless Celebrities, and to be fair, in the early editions at least, some of them were (Merily McGivern anybody?) These later took up residence on Saturdays.

Series 5

A further variant on round one was introduced in what apparently was Series 5 (which ran on from series 4 without break or acknowledgement - the only clues being an update on the cut-off point for time-sensitive subjects and the fact that the Coveted Pointless Trophy appears to have been very subtly redesigned with a slightly larger volume of clear glass at the top), in which two related categories are played, one on each pass, e.g. the first time this was played, the categories were "Boy Bands" and "Rock Bands", with the players on the first pass naming Westlife hits and those on the second pass naming Status Quo hits. Considering how rapidly the show is burning through categories (and there does seem to be a bit of desperation creeping in to the head-to-head questions with subsets of previous categories turning up with increasing regularity), it seems a bit strange to suddenly introduce a game format that uses up even more.

Later changes

Alright, we admit it, we've lost track of where the series breaks are. Anyway, over the next couple of years, the format was gradually refined and by Autumn 2013, the format had settled down to the one we now know, in which one of the first two rounds will be a category question (or sometimes an "identify people or things in this picture" question), and the other is Q&A. The two-linked-subjects and pick-from-a-list questions are long gone.

The head-to-head is now a best-of-three question-and-answer round, and usually comprises a picture question, a "clues to five facts about x" question and some sort of "disguised words" question, where five things in a category are given as anagrams, or with missing letters. A few other variations are sometimes used. In the celebrity version there is often a question using music clips, which have also started to appear in some of the post-COVID epsiodes of the regular show. The picture question normally comes first, unless there has already been a picture question earlier in the show. For a while in series 10 (September/October 2013) they experimented with not always having the picture question first, but it soon went back to normal.

From 7 September 2020 episodes, they reprised the old "of seven, at least one is pointless and one is wrong" boards from series two, but before the head to head and with only six options, of which two are pointless and two are wrong, to give the contestants a chance to add a bit more money to the jackpot. The pairs are encouraged to discuss the answers openly, though the sight of four contestants getting into a huddle to share their expertise (or otherwise) was short-lived as episodes from 6 April 2021 were shot during the COVID-19 pandemic with social distancing in place (though producers insisted pairs must be "bubbled" together, so it avoided the acrylic screens of the celebrity version). Another effect was that to reduce the number of players needed, each pair was given three chances to win the jackpot instead of two. Around this time, Xander stopped giving each question in clue rounds twice.

Richard Osman announced his departure from the daytime series - but not Pointless Celebrities - on 8 April 2022, and his last episode aired on 20 July 2022. (What's the matter, too big to slum it with Joe Public now you're a successful author?) Series 28, planned for 12 September 2022 and the first episodes to utilise guest hosts, were delayed by coverage of the death and funeral of Queen Elizabeth II; it was considered a shame to waste new episodes on the second channel. (Curiously, rather than just carry on with the repeats from early 2020 they had been showing over the summer, for a week they snapped back to episodes from early 2019 - not very far back, considering the show's history, but enough to be lacking both the bonus round and, even more jarringly, Richard's beard.) For the first two Osman-free civilian series, celebrities filmed for three days, usually for eleven episodes, unless you're Ed Gamble, who did only ten, Stephen Mangan, Konnie Huq, or Ria Lina, who did an extra four episodes at the start of series 30, or Vick Hope, who did the last ten episodes of that series.

Also jarring: changes to the celebrity version for the BBC Centenary edition in November 2022, and later made permanent. Celebrities got the new 'of six, two are pointless, two are wrong' boards civilians had been facing for more than two years (how far in advance do they actually film these?!?). Additionally, the jackpot question is reduced to two subcategories instead of three, which feels as though it's partially undoing the longstanding contestant- (and viewer-) friendliness of the prize round. And in a baffling display of change-for-change's-sake, if the celebrities give three pointless answers, they now get a bonus of - wait for it - £500! What's the bleeding point - it's insultingly low if you win (you’ve won a four figure sum! Let’s see if you’ve won FIVE HUNDRED POUNDS more!), and actively insulting and anticlimactic if you don't. (To be fair, if civilians are only playing for £1,000, an extra £500 might work, though perhaps not if they've just won a bloated rollover jackpot. The starting jackpot in Pointless Celebrities is £2,500.) This was something that a lot of viewers had called for on social media for years - but really should have been resisted, since it now imposes an extra level of anticlimax onto every single episode. And worse, said vandalism (the two-category endboards and the dud-ending "bonus" prize) later oozed onto the civilian editions in time for the start of series 29, beginning 3 April 2023.

Key moments

There was some rather paranoid censorship in the third series - the film titles Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me and Inglourious Basterds (both incorrect answers to their respective questions) suffered post-production bleeps. You wouldn't get that happening on The Weakest Link. When Inglourious Basterds was offered as an answer to "Quentin Tarantino Films" in series 8 (correctly this time), the contestant had to whisper the second word in Xander's ear. (Shouldn't it have been Richard's ear?)

Also in series 8: one contestant making up a random name, James Brown, for people in 'The Magnificent Seven' and 'The Dirty Dozen', only to discover there was an old American actor called Jim Brown (James Nathaniel Brown) who was in the Dirty Dozen, who was pointless!

On a similar tip, occasional jammy answers in the jackpot round, including the pair who won on surnames of Japanese Prime Ministers by suggesting "Yamamoto". As the contestants themsleves pointed out, while it was definitely a Japanese surname. the Yamamoto they were thinking of was killed in WW2 and so couldn't possibly have gone on to serve as Prime Minister - but luckily for them an unrelated, and unremembered, Yamamoto did have a couple of brief spells as PM so the jackpot was still theirs. Another memorable and extremely lucky win came when a pair of contestants who it's probably fair to say knew nothing at all about The Princess Diaries, reckoned "Royal Wedding" would be a plausible title for one of the books - and it proved not only plausible, but correct, and pointless.

Sometimes an obscure jackpot category will keep turning up again and again, potentially for years, before anyone takes it, and will become a running joke in its own right. One contestant managed to successfully exploit this by specifically revising "rare breeds of poultry" in the hope that it would still be there when he recorded his show. Of course, even if it was still in the rotation, there was no guarantee it would come up in his selection... but it was and it did. Kerching!

An awkward moment during a head to head round was to name a Capital City of South America where a contestant on one team went with "Paranimebo", then the other contestant on another team realised a pronunciation mistake on the answer and went with the same answer but in a different pronunciation "Paramaribo". Obviously, the mispronounced answer was an incorrect answer and the pronounced answer scored them one point and into the final round.

The wrath of Richard whenever anyone says something is before their time.

One edition asked the pairs to name any act who released one of the UK's Top 40 Biggest Selling Albums of 2015. A contestant asked if she could answer with 'Alexander Armstrong'. A momentarily flattered and flustered Xander checked that they definitely wanted to do that, which they did. The result was a look of genuine surprise and joy on his face upon finding out that he himself was a Pointless answer, having released the 32nd biggest selling record of the year!

Catchphrases

"You just didn't have that pointless [subject] knowledge" (series 1 and 2)

(When demonstrating the wrong answer graphics) "You really don't want to see that..."

"There's your red line."

"Let's see if it's right, and if so, how many people said it"

"It's good! It's very good!"

"Well done if you got that at home."

"It's my Pointless friend - it's Richard." (Usually preceded by some surreal epithet or metaphor relating to Richard's apparent mastery of obscure facts.)

"Great contestants!" (For the first three or four years, Xander would say this about most contestants when they left.)

Some of Richard's rules explanations are given so frequently that we expect the audience to shout out the last words with him.

For instance, "We're looking for any feature film made for cinematic release in which {actor} is given an acting credit. No TV films, short films or documentaries - but voice credits do count"

"And by 'country', we mean a sovereign state that's a member of the UN in its own right."

Alexander also has various stock phrases to introduce the show, of which arguably the best is "Welcome to Pointless - the show where the lowest scorers are the biggest winners."

"That ain't bread - that's toast!". This one was only a made-up joke catchphrase for a week or so, but it gets callbacks every now and again.

Theme music

Marc Sylvan

Trivia

The very first category on the show was "Capital cities of Europe" and the first answer ever given, Podgorica, was pointless.

During the programme's run, "Central African Republic" has proven to be the most pointless country in the world. In the first series it appeared as a pointless answer to four separate questions: "Countries beginning with C", "African countries", "French-speaking countries" and "national flags with stars on". And just to rub it in, its capital Bangui was a pointless answer to "Capital cities beginning with B". In the third celebrity special in 2011, it appeared as a pointless answer to "Countries with five or more borders" while it was also a pointless answer to "Flags with the colour green on them" and "Countries that have had a female leader" (i.e. an elected one) in series 5. Furthermore, in series 6, it was a pointless answer when its prime minister Faustin-Archange Touadéra was amongst the heads listed in "Leaders and their countries".

One sharp correspondent noted a bit of a gaffe, or at least an inconsistency, during a round on "Tudor and Stuart Monarchs of Great Britain". Mary, Queen of Scots was ruled to be an incorrect answer, because she was only queen of Scotland ("the clue is in the name," said Richard). However, monarchs of England before the union of the crowns were allowed, so strictly speaking, she should have counted as well (along with a number of other pre-union Scottish monarchs). All of which leads us to ponder how well contestants would fare if faced with the topic of pre-union Scottish monarchs. There's only one way to find out... and we don't mean fight.

The largest amount of money won on the show is £24,750, won on 8 March 2013, when the jackpot question was "UK top 40 hits by Julio or Enrique Iglesias" and the winning answer was "Maybe". This beat the previous record of £20,250 set only a few weeks earlier on 23 January 2013 ("Phillip Pullman books": The Shadow in the North). Other large jackpots include the £20,000 won on 20 November 2012 ("Countries whose name contains only one vowel": Panama); £15,500 won on 4 August 2011 ("Marlon Brando Films": The Island of Doctor Moreau); £12,750 on 29 March 2012 (Toy Story films voice actors: Timothy Dalton); and £12,250, which was won twice in the second series, firstly on 10 March 2010 ("National trails of England and Wales": The Ridgeway), and again on 16 April 2010 ("Countries that use a dollar": Tuvalu). The largest jackpot under the new-style jackpot round introduced in June 2013 is £13,500 on 29 July 2020 ("GB train station names that contain the word 'green'": Heald Green). After the bonus booster round was introduced for the next new episode, on 7 September 2020, a £16,750 jackpot was won on 9 October 2020 ("Opening ceremony flag-bearers for Team GB": Wilf O'Reilly), a £13,750 jackpot was won on 2 June 2021 ("Medal-winning teams at the 2018 Winter Olympics": Kazakhstan) and a £12,750 jackpot was won on 8 October 2021 ("Acts that have had UK Top 40 singles with the word 'stop' in the title": Glee Cast), and after the jackpot round was vandalised remixed, a £10,250 jackpot was won on 14 November 2023 ("Noughties football teams", "Men's FA Cup final goalscorers 2000-2009": "Louis Saha").

On 3 September 2010, contestants David and Susan received the unenviable honour of being the first contestants in Pointless history to receive 100 points, but not as a result of giving an incorrect answer. Given a list of possible answers, the contestants had to answer with what type of food they thought each one was. Contestant David answered that Parmesan was a type of cheese and was perfectly correct, however unfortunately for him and his wife Susan, all of the 100 people surveyed also knew it was a type of cheese, meaning they scored 100 points, despite answering correctly. However, thanks to a strong performance from Susan, the couple still managed to win both the round and the show - though not the jackpot. Rather bizarrely, a seemingly even more obvious answer, namely plaice being a type of fish, scored a comparatively modest 93. To date, two other 100-point answers have been given. One was by contestant MJ on 19 February 2013, when the category was "Capital Cities" and the clue "Hosted the 2012 Olympics". (Oh, and the answer was "London", as if you didn't know.) She and her dad survived the round, but didn't win the show. The other was given by Antony Worrall Thompson on a chefs edition of Pointless Celebrities broadcast 31 August 2013, when all 100 people knew the foodstuff omitted from the film title [blank], I Shrunk The Kids. Xander was amazed by this and claimed he'd never seen it happen before - given that the copyright date on the end of the show was 2012, it's just possible that the episode was recorded before MJ's, but you'd think he might recall the previous occasion. On the first pass in the same round, Worrall Thompson's team mate Rustie Lee correctly stated that 'Peach' was the missing word in James and the Giant [blank]. However this scored 89 points, giving the pair a total score of 189, the highest score ever recorded on the programme, without giving an incorrect answer.

On 21 July 2011, the first round subject was "U2 Singles" and amazingly all of the first four contestants gave incorrect answers, resulting in the row of 100s seen below. Surprisingly (and to the relief of all concerned), the return pass went off without a hitch. For the record, none of these are U2 singles: "Red Red Wine" (the contestant admitted she always got U2 and UB40 confused), "Hello Hello" (the player was thinking of "Vertigo", which her partner gave on the second pass), "Goodbye" (which was a flat-out guess) and "The Joshua Tree" (a U2 album, not a single). This happened again on 27 March 2012 with the subject "Robert Redford films". On 26 October 2015, the second round, on naming the acts who recorded hits with "Wish" in the title, produced no correct answers at all, with all three pairs scoring 200, then when allowed to confer, all failing yet again (one pair even guessed that the 1978 hit "Wishing On A Star" was by Val Doonican, despite Xander already having let slip that the singer was female!). They ended up having to bring out a back-up question (naming composers in Classic FM's Hall of Fame) and the two teams that progressed did so with scores of 301 and 303.

On the edition broadcast 10 May 2024, the second round question asked the pairs to name any chemical element with three different vowels in its name. All six players gave Pointless answers which added £1,500 to the jackpot but resulted in a sudden-death tiebreaker. However, another three Pointless answers were given so another £750 was added but they had to go round again - one wonders why didn't just bring out a backup question like they did before. Eventually, the chain was broken £2,750 later and a couple was sent home... with a score of 1! Alexander and Gabby Logan cosplaying as Richard Osman were openly reveling in, what they called, 'Pointless History' - maybe the writers will think long and hard about chemical element questions in the future!

During the third series, the show was taken off air for a couple of weeks to make way for coverage of the 2010 Commonwealth Games. By a pleasing coincidence, the very first subject when it returned was "Realms of the Commonwealth", which was suddenly very easy for anyone who'd been watching that timeslot. This couldn't have been planned, because the series wasn't even recorded with the intention that it would go out around the time of the Games, but was brought forward as an emergency replacement for the planned show Perfection, which had to be re-shot due to a production error. Another unexpectedly topical question - with a twist of irony this time - appeared on 20 October 2022 after guest host episodes were delayed by six weekdays due to the death of Queen Elizabeth II: guest Osmanista Lauren Laverne's first question, asking about Prime Ministers who had served more than two years in office, happened to premiere on the very day Liz Truss resigned and became the shortest serving Prime Minister ever.

The fourth series consisted of 60 episodes, which were shown in two separate runs. The first 25 episodes were shown in Spring 2011 in the usual 4:30pm weekday slot on BBC Two. However when the remaining 35 episodes came to be shown in Summer of the same year, the programme was promoted to the 5:15pm weekday slot on BBC One, home for many years to The Weakest Link, which by that point had already been axed, and was demoted back to BBC Two, taking the slot vacated by Pointless. The first episodes to be shown on BBC One were five celebrity specials, from 4 to 8 July 2011, after which, the remaining 35 episodes from the fourth series were shown from 11 July 2011.

One new episode, series 17 episode 40, slipped over to BBC2 on 20 January 2017, as BBC1 showed NBC's The Apprentice from Washington DC. New episodes did not premiere on BBC Two again until 30 March 2020, when episodes 47-51 and 55 of series 22 and episodes 1-9 of series 23 were premiered there between 30 March and 17 April as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic. (Bizarrely, episodes 52-54 had aired out of order on BBC One in January.) Further episodes premiered on BBC Two on 2 (S23E14), 3 (S23E15) and 9 July (S23E19), 30 September (S23E51) and 20 October 2020 (S24E10), and 5 (S24E21), 7 (S24E23), 11 (S24E25), 15 (S24E29), 18 (S24E30), 22 (S24E34), 25 (S24E35), 26 (S24E36) and 27 January (S24E37) and 1 (S24E40), 3 (S24E42), 8 (S24E45), 10 (S24E47) and 15 February (S24E50) and 10 (S25E24) and 14 May (S25E28) and 12 (S25E49) and 19 (S25E54) due to impromptu resumptions of waffle. To make matters worse, a November repeat of series 22, episode 48 had to be bumped to the second channel due to Yet More Waffle, and a repeat of series 22, episode 50 was interrupted by jabbering from the gallery.

There were still occasional scheduled moves to BBC2. New episodes shuffled over on 20 January and 7 May 2021, series 24 episode 32 and series 25 episode 23, as BBC1 aired the US presidential inauguration and extended domestic election coverage respectively. A July 2021 repeat of series 23, episode 51 (along with the four preceding it and the five following it) aired on the second channel due to Olympics coverage. A repeat of S24E22 on 28 October 2021 was another scheduled move to BBC2, while the main channel showed the Euro 2022 women's draw; sport would also displace 1-5 and 12-19 August 2022 repeats. (The repeat on 1 April 2022 was a rare BBC2 broadcast of Pointless Celebrities, thanks to BBC1 carrying the men's draw; this would have been a great way to burn off Mark Morriss' episode but they opted not to do that.) A new episode of Pointless Celebrities would not air on the second channel until 10 September 2022, and even then only as a result of coverage of Queen Elizabeth II blanketing BBC1. Josh Widdicombe's third episode was shunted off to the second channel due to BBC News preferring to air Rishi Sunak announcing the date for the 2024 general election.

To mark the programme's 200th edition on 30 September 2011, four couples who had previously appeared on the programme, but had scored the maximum of 200 points were invited back to try again. For the 500th edition on 6 June 2013, four pairs who had narrowly missed out on winning the jackpot were invited back for another go, and for the 1000th edition (the count includes celebrity shows), Richard and Xander swapped places and the contestants were the show's first jackpot winners (at least one of whom had flown in from Cyprus specially), the biggest jackpot winners, a pair who gave three pointless answers to the jackpot question (and proceeded to give another two in the opening round), and the winners of the biggest jackpot on Pointless Celebrities (not that this is saying much; the jackpot on the celebrity editions rarely budges from its initial £2,500), Trev and Simon. The latter pair won.

Three celebrities have won the jackpot three times: Shaun Williamson, who won with three separate celebrities, one of them being Paul Henry, formerly Benny in 'Crossroads', and Ewen MacIntosh and Patrick Baladi. Williamson appeared on the show on a fourth occasion and was defeated in the head to head in this case. In addition, the actor Steve Pemberton has won the jackpot twice.

Because we do get asked about this... yes, in the Richard Osman episodes, the computer is just a prop. That's why, when Richard has to read anything, it's always off a sheet of paper. Presumably this is just a Reasonable Adjustment to accommodate Richard's nystagmus, on the grounds that Sally Lindsay actually did read her pieces off the computer - which presumably we can expect to happen with other non-Richard "Pointless friends" in future.

And because we get asked about this, too... the height of the Coveted Pointless Trophy is five inches.

Apparently the producers have tried to interest the BBC in a children's version but for some reason Auntie Beeb won't take it.

At least twice, Pointless Celebrities episodes have been dedicated to celebrities who died between recording and broadcast; the 14 April 2018 edition was dedicated to Bill Maynard, and the 2 April 2022 episode - originally planned for 2023 - was brought forward in tribute to Tom Parker.

A 2018 "news and politics" edition of Pointless Celebrities was postponed due to news stories about one of the contestants, former Scottish First Minster Alex Salmond, and it remains unaired. Salmond was on the winning pair with Cathy Newman from Channel 4 News.

Future House of Games contestant Leo Reich was a contestant pre-fame, and erstwhile "Preston Front" and "Dinnerladies" actor Adrian Hood appeared as a contestant... having previously been a Pointless answer for his appearances in the latter.

One 2024 episode had "Top 40 singles by Super Furry Animals" as a jackpot question - a category some of us had assumed would never come up since one of their titles contains a word that isn't yet broadcastable at five to six in the evening. Even stranger, going by the given list of scoring answers, that title would have been a legitimate, jackpot-worthy pointless answer. It's possible that, had the players come up with it, they would have been supplied with a substitute of identical (i.e. pointless) value for a retake, as has been known to happen on Countdown, although they were happy to air a contestant's suggestion of Inglourious Basterds a few episodes earlier on Logan's last episode. But in the event, the contestants didn't know enough about Super Furry Animals to make that a problem.

Merchandise

The 100 Most Pointless Things in the World (book)

Pointless The Board Game and Pointless New Edition Board Game (er, board games)

Web links

BBC programme pages: Pointless, Pointless Celebrities

Wikipedia entry

TV Tropes discussion

Pictures

See also

Weaver's Week review (2009), and discussion of what a "country" isn't (2014).

How to apply

Applications are available online for pairs of players to become contestants for future series. An alternative way to get an application form on paper is available via e-mail at pointless@remarkable.tv

Application details are provided as a service to readers, but please note that all contestant enquiries should be directed to the named production company and not to UKGameshows.com. Addresses can be found on our list of contact details for production companies.

Feedback

To correct something on this page or post an addition, please complete this form and press "Send":
If you are asking us a question, please read our contact us page and FAQ first.

Name: E-mail: